Former President Trump as soon as referred to as CNN’s Don Lemon “the dumbest man on tv.” And on Thursday night time he as soon as once more proved it by exhibiting how he doesn’t perceive what constitutes a majority of the Senate. Lashing out at Senate Republicans and Democratic Senators Kyrsten Sinema (AZ) and Joe Manchin (WV), he recommended the refusal to explode the filibuster was the “minority ruling the bulk.”

Simply to rapidly go over the mathematics:  50 + 2 = 52 and 52 out of 100 is a majority.

“GOP will not shield the vote. Two members of his personal celebration will not carve out the filibuster to make it occur,” Lemon decried in his opening screed. “That is what you name — I imply it is flat out it is a minority ruling the bulk. That is what it’s.”

Including: “It is what occurs when you could have a — a razor-thin majority however a minority celebration explicitly saying, ‘we’re not going to work with you.’ A minority celebration who seems voting rights, they do not actually care about it. It would not matter to them.”

A couple of minutes later, he spoke with CNN senior political analyst Ron Brownstein asserted that Manchin and Sinema’s protection of the filibuster was permitting “for the pink states to proceed to steadily tighten the tourniquet on voting rights all through this decade.”

 

 

Brownstein went on to warn of a coming “nice divergence” the place Republicans could be “unwinding of civil liberties and civil rights”:

So we could possibly be in a interval of a major unwinding of civil liberties and civil rights that transcend voting rights within the pink states. I imply, it’s extremely possible the Supreme Court docket goes to let the states — the pink states prohibit or ban abortion. We’re seeing rollbacks of LGBTQ rights, First Modification rights by way of limiting how academics can discuss race in faculties or how folks can protest, heighten penalties for protesters.

There’s a nice divergence, I believe, that’s forward between what fundamental civil liberties appear to be in pink states or blue states, and immediately is a turning level or crossroads on that path.

“Hear, the lion’s share of the blame must be positioned on Republicans as a result of they’re simply not going to budge, but in addition on the 2 Democrats who’ve this form of misguided thought of what the filibuster is definitely about and the historical past of the filibuster,” Lemon sneered in response.

Constructing off of Lemon’s assault on Republicans, Brownstein confirmed his disdain for democracy as he decried Republican MAJORITIES in state legislatures passing election legal guidelines. “We’re seeing Republicans impose these voting restrictions within the pink states on a party-line majority vote foundation,” he stated. “The states are passing these restrictions on a party-line majority foundation.”

“You say immediately reveals that the trifecta of red-state legislatures, the right-leaning Supreme Court docket, and the Senate filibuster making it inconceivable for Democrats to control even once they win elections,” Lemon huffed.

Inform that to Trump who had his agenda foiled by obstructionist Democrats.

In fact, this all served to push the Huge Lie that Republicans are limiting entry to the fitting to vote.

 

The transcript is beneath, click on “develop” to learn:

CNN’s Don Lemon Tonight
January 13, 2022
10:13:31 p.m. Japanese

(…)

DON LEMON: So, the President admitting defeat as a result of the GOP will not shield the vote. I imply, it is actually primarily concerning the GOP as a result of you’ll be able to’t get one or two when it is often bipartisan. However you’ll be able to’t get one or two, even a pair? Nope.

GOP will not shield the vote. Two members of his personal celebration will not carve out the filibuster to make it occur.

That is what you name — I imply it is flat out it is a minority ruling the bulk. That is what it’s. It is what occurs when you could have a — a razor skinny majority however a minority celebration explicitly saying, “we’re not going to work with you.” A minority celebration who seems voting rights, they do not actually care about it. It would not matter to them.

After which there’s the conservative majority Supreme Court docket in a choice that could be a enormous hit to the President’s try to make use of the facility of the federal authorities to struggle the pandemic. The Supreme Court docket blocking his vaccine and testing rule for giant companies however permitting a vaccine mandate for some healthcare employees to enter impact nationwide.

(…)

10:36:18 p.m. Japanese

RON BROWNSTEIN: It is a momentous day. I imply, you realize, you’ll be able to take a look at the failure now with Kyrsten Sinema saying she’ll not settle for any carve-out from the filibuster for voting rights, in addition to Joe Manchin echoing that positon. You at the moment are able the place the street could also be clear for the pink states to proceed to steadily tighten the tourniquet on voting rights all through this decade.

I imply the Supreme Court docket has made clear it isn’t going to intrude. The Roberts courtroom has by no means overturned a state voting rights restriction, and actually sort of banged the gong for every thing you are seeing with the Shelby County resolution, in 2013 eliminating the Justice Division’s preclearance authority.

And with Manchin and Sinema saying you want a supermajority, a bipartisan supermajority for Congress to behave, there could also be no efficient constraint on what the pink states can do.

So we could possibly be in a interval of a major unwinding of civil liberties and civil rights that transcend voting rights within the pink states. I imply, it’s extremely possible the Supreme Court docket goes to let the states — the pink states prohibit or ban abortion. We’re seeing rollbacks of LGBTQ rights, First Modification rights by way of limiting how academics can discuss race in faculties or how folks can protest, heighten penalties for protesters.

There’s a nice divergence, I believe, that’s forward between what fundamental civil liberties appear to be in pink states or blue states, and immediately is a turning level or crossroads on that path.

LEMON: And all of this – Hear, the lion’s share of the blame must be positioned on Republicans as a result of they’re simply not going to budge, but in addition on the 2 Democrats who’ve this form of misguided thought of what the filibuster is definitely about and the historical past of the filibuster.

[Crosstalk]

Go on.

BROWNSTEIN: Consider the asymmetry that’s in place right here. We’re seeing Republicans impose these voting restrictions within the pink states on a party-line majority vote foundation. There are three Democratic votes whole within the state legislatures for probably the most restrictive voting legal guidelines. And one thing like solely 19 out of 1,600 state legislative Republicans have voted towards them. The states are passing these restrictions on a party-line majority foundation.

The Supreme Court docket choices which have opened the door to this. The Shelby County resolution in 2013 and the Rucho resolution in 2019 every had been accredited on a party-line majority foundation. 5 Republican appointees outvoting 4 Democratic appointees. However Manchin and Sinema have set a normal that Congress can reply to those restrictions on voting rights solely with a bipartisan supermajority of 60 votes.

And that sort of incongruity, that sort of imbalance within the taking part in discipline just about ensures, I believe, that by way of the 2020s we will see extra slightly than much less restrictions on folks’s entry to the poll field.

LEMON: Why are you — I assume you answered a part of it. You say immediately reveals that the trifecta of red-state legislatures, the right-leaning Supreme Court docket, and the Senate filibuster making it inconceivable for Democrats to control even once they win elections.

Source link